Tuesday, 14 January 2014 16:29

West Virginia disaster foretold

Written by  Jeff Biggers | Al Jazeera
People wait in line for water from a 7,500 gallon tanker truck brought in from Washington, Pa., on Friday, Jan. 10, at Riverside High School near Charleston, W.Va. A chemical spill left the water for 300,000 people in and around West Virginia's capital city stained blue-green and smelling like licorice for days. People wait in line for water from a 7,500 gallon tanker truck brought in from Washington, Pa., on Friday, Jan. 10, at Riverside High School near Charleston, W.Va. A chemical spill left the water for 300,000 people in and around West Virginia's capital city stained blue-green and smelling like licorice for days. Craig Cunningham/The Daily Mail/AP

Since Jan. 9, when a chemical used to process coal leaked into West Virginia’s Elk River, images of beleaguered Charleston residents lining up for bottles of water from National Guard tankers have dominated the headlines. With some restrictions on water use lifted on Jan. 13, Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin declared, “We see light at the end of the tunnel.”

The tunnel of denial, hopefully. The fallout over the chemical spill from a coal-processing plant should serve as a wake-up call to the nation after years of pleas by coal-mining communities for federal invention in the state’s rogue regulatory agencies that oversee the coal industry and its chemical-industry counterparts. 

Tomblin has attempted to distance the coal industry from the nation’s latest environmental disaster. Asked if the spill was a result of the state’s heavy reliance on the coal industry, he quickly replied, “This was not a coal-company incident. This was a chemical-company incident.” But the entangled reality of dirty coal and its toxic chemical cleansers has finally arrived at the governor’s front door — and faucet. 

“This crisis is about much more than a renegade chemical company,” said Bob Kincaid, board president of Coal River Mountain Watch, an organization based in Raleigh County in the state’s southern coalfields that fights mountaintop-removal mining. “It’s about an entire state subjected day after day for more than a century to a laundry list of poisons by renegade companies. This particular poisoning happened to catch the world’s attention, but for us, it’s another day in the Appalachian Sacrifice Zone.”

The question is, Will the nation continue to turn a blind eye to the mounting toll of the aging extraction industry on the health and livelihoods of central Appalachians or take action against the growing, untenable costs of mining, cleaning, transporting and burning dirty coal? It must. It is high time for the national media and federal officials to finally turn the investigative and regulatory spotlight on coal country’s disastrous water-protection policies.

Contamination, in denial

Attempts to regulate coal mining and its various stages of processing in West Virginia, as in coal-mining regions in other states, have long met with denial, especially when it comes to inadequacies in the monitoring of water cleanliness. Whether it is a deadly coal slurry spill, coal ash pondbreakage or toxic discharges of heavy metals into the waterways from strip mining, a regulatory crisis is never considered a real crisis until it is validated by a disaster.

In Mingo County, W.Va., coal-mining residents settled a major lawsuit in 2011 with the former Massey Energy coal company after the injection of 1.4 billion gallons of toxic coal slurry — waste fluid produced by washing coal with water and chemicals before sending it to market — into underground mines contaminated their aquifers, wells and other drinking-water sources. “We had some faith that if your water was contaminated, that your government would step in and do something,” former miner Brenda McCoy told visiting filmmakers in 2011. “But they didn’t.”

In Prenter, W.Va., a corridor of brain tumors, kidney and liver failure and respiratory problems finally came to light in a 2009 New York Times expose on coal companies. The series reported that the coal companies had pumped “into the ground illegal concentrations of chemicals — the same pollutants that flowed from residents’ taps.” As the Times noted, “state regulators never fined or punished those companies for breaking those pollution laws.”

This most recent spill — of the coal-cleaning chemical 4-methylcyclohexanemethanol (MCMH) — was not just an accident waiting to happen. It was also a bitter reminder of the myriad potentially deadly coal-related issues that daily threaten the waterways of central Appalachia. 

“The Elk River spill wasn’t an isolated accident,” Angie Rosser, executive director of the West Virginia Rivers Coalition, wrote in a Jan. 12 op-ed for the Charleston Gazette. “It was the inevitable consequence of weak regulatory enforcement over many years, made possible by our collective failure to uphold the values we profess.”

If our nation is serious about ensuring that clean water is delivered to citizens’ faucets, it cannot put clean-water regulations in the hands of the states.

Such regulatory failures have environmental consequences beyond this most recent spill. As David Biello, an editor at Scientific American, noted, there are far graver dangers to human health than MCMH waiting around the bend, such as “exposure to the slurry of water and other chemicals formed after coal is washed.” Situating the Elk River spill in the larger issue of coal-waste management, he noted the “numerous coal-slurry floods and spills in West Virginia and U.S. history.” (Perhaps the most notorious of these occurred in 1972 when the failure of a coal company’s dam in Logan County, W.Va., let loose a deluge of water and coal waste that killed 125 residents.)

And when it comes to the thousands of miles of waterways sullied by reckless strip-miningoperations in central Appalachia, those poisoned waters have long acted as messengers of the extraordinary health costs of coal mining for everyone who lives downstream.

But as top West Virginia officials discussed the Elk River spill, the lack of precautionary planning for such environmental disasters was clear. They admitted they were stumbling just to figure out the basics of the spill and its health implications — and even the name of the chemical approved for cleaning coal.

As Randy Huffman, cabinet secretary for the state’s Department of Environmental Protection, toldthe Washington Post, “I can’t pronounce the chemical name. It’s MH, MCMH — It’s something like that.”

Breaking an outlaw mentality

West Virginians may be tough enough to forgo a hot shower, but its governor has long treated the coal industry and its chemical associates with kid gloves. According to recent reports in The New York Times, the chemical plant site had not been inspected in over 20 years.

“This is but one spill that has poisoned the water supply of hundreds of thousands of innocent people due to the outlaw mentality of the coal industry,” said longtime West Virginia activist Bo Webb, who lives below a mountaintop-removal operation.

It is a mentality that coal-country residents and environmentalists have sought to bring to heel.

Last summer coal-mining activists with the West Virginia–based group Radical Action for Mountain People’s Survival paddled a boat onto a 2.8-billion-gallon coal-slurry impoundment in Raleigh County — one of the more than 100 so-called toxic lakes full of liquid coal waste that dot West Virginia — in order to draw attention to, as one participant wrote, inaction for “Appalachian people who live every day slowly being poisoned by their own drinking water.”

Protests have also centered on the Brushy Fork coal-slurry impoundment dam, one of the largest in the nation. Residents downslope from it would have less than 15 minutes to escape a 72-foot tidal wave of coal slurry if nearby mountaintop-removal blasts caused the dam to fail. (It is considered a class-C dam because if it fails, it could cause loss of human life.)

But will the state of West Virginia or federal officials ever respond beyond the shuffle of endless petitions?

On Dec. 30 the U.S. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement finally agreed to investigate five out of 19 West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection regulatory failings cited in a petition by the Citizen Action for Real Enforcement campaign. The 120-page petition, filed in June, included such issues as flooding impacts and mining-pollutant discharge violations.

For some residents, such action is welcome but far too little and too late. 

“Right now my eyes burn. I’ve had a headache for four days … because the real emergency alarm did not sound,” West Virginia poet Crystal Goodwoman told me on Sunday.

The bottom line in West Virginia and the more than 20 other states where coal is mined is this: If our nation is serious about ensuring that clean water is delivered to citizens’ faucets, it cannot put clean-water regulations in the hands of the states, as the U.S. House of Representatives did Jan. 9 by quietly passing the Reducing Excessive Deadline Obligations Act of 2013. We also need to stop talking about mitigating the environmental and health impacts of coal mining and start investing in a transition to clean energy endeavors through a coalfields regeneration fund.

“If we are going to create safer environmental policies without jeopardizing the economy, we have to start telling the truth,” Goodwoman said. “The only way to win — and by winning, I mean staying alive — is to tell the truth and change policy. We all need water and air. We all have a job to do.”

Link to original article from Al Jazeera

Read 5979 times

Trans Pacific Partnership Fast Track - Where Does Your Legislator Stand

Click your state to see your Senators and Representatives

Green = Most Legislators Oppose Fast Track, Yellow = Some Opposition, Orange = Oppose TPP, Gray = Unknown
DeLauro 13 - Signed 2013 DeLauro/Miller letter
Pocan - Signed Freshman Letter Opposing Fast Track
W/M - Signed Ways and Means Letter opposing TPP
Gibson - Signed Rep. Chris Gibson letter opposing TPP
SOPA - Oppose Stop Online Piracy Act - voted against
Currency - Oppose Currency Manipulation (Signed Michaud Letter)
Textile - Oppose changes to "First Yarn" (Signed Textile Industry Letter)

Published Letters to the Editor

  • Pacific trade pact would do more harm than good: Guest opinion

    If government and big business representatives from 12 countries spend years negotiating a massive new trade bill but don't tell the general public about it, does it still go into effect? Can it still accelerate the flow of American jobs to countries that have abysmal records on human rights and labor rights, countries like Vietnam? Can it still spur a race to the bottom where Americans forfeit their moral, environmental and employment standards for larger trade deficits of cheap imported goods and minimum wage employment at home?

    Written on Thursday, 12 December 2013 00:00

Join our Twitter Storm

If you have a Twitter account you can help stop Fast Track on the TPP. Sign-in to your Twitter account and copy and paste the Tweets from our Twitter storm. Or you can copy your favorite Tweet and then click on the map and Tweet your legislator.

Twitter Storm Tweets for Tuesday, January 28th @ 9pm Eastern

Tweets for the special State of the Union Twitter Storm will be posted on January 28th at 8pm EST. Check back for the new Tweets.

Find Your Member of Congress

Click here to quickly find your member of Congress by putting in your home address. This site also features a one-click link to the same information in Spanish


Then call and ask them to oppose Fast Track on the Trans Pacific Partnership.

Sample script is below.


“I'm a constituent, and I am strongly opposed to my representative giving away Congress’ constitutional authority to control our trade policy. We send people to Congress to stand up for us, not give away their power to stop more American job offshoring and protect us from dangerous imported food that doesn’t meet our safety standards. This latest so-called trade deal, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), would not only do that - but also ban Buy American and increase our medicine prices. That’s why it’s crucial that Congress not give away its authority to make sure every provision of TPP is in our interest before this massive deal can be signed. Good trade deals don’t need to be railroaded through Congress using Fast Track. I hope my representative will commit to opposing this outrageous legislation.”

Email Your Senators and Rep - Say No On Fast Track and TPP

Send an email directly to your Senators and Representatives courtesy of our partners at CWA. Enter your zip code and your members are automatically selected.


Sign the ERA Petition


On Friday, September 12th more than 150 activists will go to DC and Demand that their Senators and Representatives support removing the ratification deadline from the ERA (SJ Res 15 and HJ Res 113)


Sign the Petition - Sen. Sanders Run as a Democrat in 2016


Lori Wallach on the TPP from PDA Progressive Roundtable

Progressive Roundtable with Reps. Ellison and Pocan and Lori Wallach on TPP

TPP: The Biggest Threat to the Internet You've Probably Never Heard Of

Flush the TPP

Congress only has one more week in session this year, the week of December 9. So far our pressure to stop the TPP has been working. Visit Flush the TPP for calling scripts and links to Members of the Ways and Means Committee.

Flush the TPP