Sunday, 16 November 2014 00:00

Obama Stands Firm on Keystone XL, Veto Likely if Passed by Congress

Written by  Anastasia Pantsios | Eco Watch
As Republicans have made clear their desire to rush approval of the Keystone XL pipeline and the Senate prepares to vote next week under pressure from pipeline-favoring Louisiana Democrat Mary Landrieu, President Obama is strongly suggested this morning the legislation won’t get past his desk.

Traveling to Myanmar following an economic conference in Beijing where he joined with Chinese President Xi Jinping to announce a historic agreement on climate change earlier this week, Obama made one of his strongest statements yet about Keystone XL.

“Understand what this project is: it is providing the ability of Canada to pump their oil, send it through our land, down to the Gulf, where it will be sold everywhere else,” he said. “It doesn’t have an impact on U.S. gas prices. If my Republican friends really want to focus on what’s good for the American people in terms of job creation and lower energy costs, we should be engaging in a conversation about what are we doing to produce even more homegrown energy? I’m happy to have that conversation.”

The President’s press secretary Josh Earnest backed up the President’s statement at his own press availability in Myanmar, outright suggesting the President was likely to veto any attempt to push through Keystone XL at this time.

Asked by a reporter if the President would sign the Keystone XL approval should it pass Congress, Earnest said, “The President, as you’ll recall in a speech that he delivered last summer, indicated that one of the factors in that review should be the degree to which a project like this would substantially contribute to the causes of climate change. So this is a project that is still under review by the State Department to determine whether or not it’s in the national interest. One of the things that is impeding the progress of that review is some ongoing litigation in Nebraska about the route of the pipeline. So it’s important in the view of this administration that this review be conducted consistent with past practice and in a way that reflects the national interests that are at stake. It is the view of the administration that that process should continue and that that’s the proper venue for determining whether the project should move forward. There has been other legislative proposals that have been floated to try to influence the outcome of this decision about the construction of the pipeline.The administration, as you know, has taken a dim view of these kinds of legislative proposals in the past. I think it’s fair to say that our dim view of these kinds of proposals has not changed.”

When pressed for a definite answer on a potential veto, Earnest said, “It’s not a yes or a no because I haven’t reviewed the specific proposal. But there have been previous proposals that I expect would be consistent with proposals that have been discussed overnight. And in evaluating those earlier proposals, we have indicated that the President’s senior advisors at the White House would recommend that he veto legislation like that. And that does continue to be our position. If that changes, I’ll obviously let all of you know. I know there’s a lot of interest in this.”

Praising the President’s words, climate advocacy group posted a statement encouraging him to stay the course.

“The strategy by some oil-soaked Senators to try and approve the Keystone XL pipeline is already backfiring,” it said. “The last time Congress tried to force the President’s hand on KXL, he sent the project back the drawing board because of concerns over the route in Nebraska. The Keystone XL pipeline is all risk and a no reward. We’ve been pushing President Obama for years to make the right call on Keystone XL and it looks like he might be gearing up to do it. We’ll continue to make the case that the real homegrown energy that America needs is 100% clean power, not dirty pipeline projects and other dangerous fossil fuels.”

Link to the original article from EcoWatch.

Read 3346 times

Featured News

  • To Achieve Highly-Touted Development Goals, End Business-as-Usual, Groups Say +

    "There is no development on a dead planet," says executive director May Boeve.   World leaders gathered at the Read More
  • Million-Liter Cyanide Spill in Argentina Highlights Canadian Mining Crimes +

    'They cannot continue to handle affairs that are so delicate, that affect the environment and people this way.' Highlighting how Read More
  • Record Cold 'Blob' in North Atlantic: Sign of Future Climate Woes? +

    Some scientists are saying new data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration could point to weakening of a North Read More
  • Scott Walker’s Campaign Failed Because Voters Actually Don’t Want a Union Buster-in-Chief +

    Yesterday Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker announced that he was ending his campaign for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination. It was Read More
  • The Long, Strange Tale of a California Farm’s Attempts To Break Its Workers’ Union +

    The strategy by one of the nation's largest growers to shed its obligation to sign a contract with the United Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60

Does Your Legislator Support the ERA