Tuesday, 06 January 2015 00:00

Breaking: Injunction Granted in Puente V. Arpaio

Written by  Puente Arizona

Federal Judge Orders Halt to Workplace Raids

Court Grants Injunction in Lawsuit Against Workplace Raids 

Arpaio and Montgomery Ordered to Stop Enforcing Statutes on which Raids are Based

PHOENIX – Federal Judge David Campbell today put a stop to the workplace raids that have torn apart countless families in Maricopa County.

The Court held that “Plaintiffs have shown that these laws are likely to be found unconstitutional” and that members of Plaintiff Puente would face irreparable harm in the absence of a court order enjoining enforcement.

“This is an enormous victory for our community,” said Carlos Garcia, executive director of Puente, a Phoenix-based human rights group that is the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit. “Arpaio and Montgomery are being stripped of the tools they use to illegally terrorize immigrant workers and families. We hope that justice will continue to prevail, that not one more worker is arrested for providing for his or her family and that the racist, anti-immigrant machine for which Arizona is known is dismantled completely.”

“When I was led away from my job in handcuffs, I never thought I would see the day that we took Arpaio and Montgomery to court instead of the other way around,” said Noemi Romero, who was arrested in a raid in 2012. “We lost our fear and made this lawsuit happen, and now others in our community won’t have to suffer like we did.”

“The decision puts an end to cruel and unlawful practices that have separated families and  disrupted communities throughout Maricopa County,” said Jessica Karp Bansal, NDLON’s Litigation Director, counsel on the case.  Bansal continued, “Neither the Maricopa County Sheriff nor the County Attorney are above the law, and this decision stands for the principle that they can no longer unconstitutionally criminalize the immigrant community with impunity.”

The case alleges that portions of A.R.S. § 13-2008 and § 13-2009 are preempted by federal law and violate the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

In addition to Puente and Rev. Frederick-Gray, Glendale resident Sara Cervantes Arreola is a plaintiff in the case. Attorneys on the case include Professors Annie Lai and Sameer Ashar of the UCI Law Immigrant Rights Clinic; Jessica Karp Bansal of NDLON; Dan Pochoda of the ACLU of Arizona Foundation; and Ray Ybarra Maldonado of the Law Office of Ray A. Ybarra Maldonado.  

Full order:

Preliminary Injunction V. Workplace Raids

 

Read more on Punetaaz.org 

Read 2896 times Last modified on Tuesday, 06 January 2015 14:05

Featured News

  • How the 2000 Election in Florida Led to a New Wave of Voter Disenfranchisement +

    A botched voter purge prevented thousands from voting—and empowered a new generation of voting-rights critics. On November 7, 2000, Willie Read More
  • Facing Down Taser, Sandra Bland Was Told By Officer: "I Will Light You Up!" +

    Betraying arrest report, newly released footage shows how arresting officer violently escalated traffic stop by threatening unarmed black woman with Read More
  • 'Dark Cloud' of ALEC Converges at Annual Corporate-Political Lovefest +

    This week, San Diego hosts 'a festival of closed-door deal-making by politicians, corporate executives and lobbyists'   Fighting to protect Read More
  • Student 'Aid' Industry Parade Crashed by Debtors Demanding Free Higher Ed +

    "A loan is not aid," declared student debt striker Michael Adorno-Miranda   When thousands of student "aid" administrators, who were Read More
  • Spreading a Minimum Wage Increase from Los Angeles to the Whole Country +

    Our economy has long been out of balance. Workers’ efforts across the country create wealth, but the profits don’t get Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50

Does Your Legislator Support the ERA

 

ERAMap