Monday, 18 May 2015 00:00

Joseph Stiglitz pens letter to congress raising concerns about investor-state provision in Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

Written by  Joseph Stiglitz | Roosevelt Institute

Roosevelt Institute Chief Economist Joseph Stiglitz sent a letter to House and Senate leadership raising concerns about the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provision being considered as part of our trade negotiations. He notes that both progressives and conservatives have come out against this provision.

The Nobel laureate writes, “There is much confusion about ISDS, but plain and simple: ISDS is about rewriting the rules of how our economy works, tipping the balance of power in favor of big businesses at the expense of workers and the public here and in partner countries.”


Read full letter below.

Letter to Congress: Stiglitz on Trade Deal

Letter to Congress: Stiglitz on Trade Deal

 

Original article on Roosevelt Institute

 

Read 3646 times Last modified on Monday, 18 May 2015 19:56

Support Postal Banking

Meme-PostalBanking-450

Button-SignthePetition

Featured News

  • Carbon Tax: The Low Oil Price Opportunity +

    Carbon taxes constitute a widely discussed policy tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and slowing humanity’s headlong rush toward catastrophic Read More
  • How the Media Hide Undocumented Workers +

    In our post-modern (or post-post-modern?) age, we are supposedly transcending the material certainties of the past. The virtual world of Read More
  • Robert Reich: The Washington Post is lying to you about Bernie Sanders +

    A new editorial claims Sanders' proposal would reduce the quality of American healthcare. The notion is ludicrous Read More
  • Corporate Crime Runs Rampant Thanks to 'Rigged' System: Elizabeth Warren +

    Report suggests 'some giant corporations—and their executives—have decided that following the law is merely optional' "Corporate criminals routinely escape meaningful Read More
  • With Wages Still Unequal, Obama Issues Mandate to Combat Pay Gap +

    Despite laws on the books, the median woman in America working full-time throughout the year is still paid just 79 Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71

Does Your Legislator Support the ERA

 

ERAMap