On Thursday, a group of Democratic lawmakers proposed a law to establish a Code of Conduct for the Supreme Court. It’s surely to have Supreme Court Justices Thomas and Scalia quaking in their Tea Party boots because it would mean they would actually have to be independent of political and other influences. They would also have to have the appearance of independence. They would have to stay away from political activity. That part would be really hard.
Published in End Corporate Rule

Support Postal Banking

Meme-PostalBanking-450

Button-SignthePetition

Featured News

  • Carbon Tax: The Low Oil Price Opportunity +

    Carbon taxes constitute a widely discussed policy tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and slowing humanity’s headlong rush toward catastrophic Read More
  • How the Media Hide Undocumented Workers +

    In our post-modern (or post-post-modern?) age, we are supposedly transcending the material certainties of the past. The virtual world of Read More
  • Robert Reich: The Washington Post is lying to you about Bernie Sanders +

    A new editorial claims Sanders' proposal would reduce the quality of American healthcare. The notion is ludicrous Read More
  • Corporate Crime Runs Rampant Thanks to 'Rigged' System: Elizabeth Warren +

    Report suggests 'some giant corporations—and their executives—have decided that following the law is merely optional' "Corporate criminals routinely escape meaningful Read More
  • With Wages Still Unequal, Obama Issues Mandate to Combat Pay Gap +

    Despite laws on the books, the median woman in America working full-time throughout the year is still paid just 79 Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71

Does Your Legislator Support the ERA

 

ERAMap