On Thursday, a group of Democratic lawmakers proposed a law to establish a Code of Conduct for the Supreme Court. It’s surely to have Supreme Court Justices Thomas and Scalia quaking in their Tea Party boots because it would mean they would actually have to be independent of political and other influences. They would also have to have the appearance of independence. They would have to stay away from political activity. That part would be really hard.
Published in End Corporate Rule

This weekend, U.S. Supreme Court reporters pulled an all-nighter waiting for the ruling on whether Texas’ new voter photo ID law, which may prevent up to 600,000 otherwise eligible voters from casting ballots this fall, would be allowed go into effect today.

Featured News

  • The Economic Impact of School Suspensions +

    A recent report found that African-American girls were suspended at much higher rates than their white peers, a phenomenon that Read More
  • How The Ferguson Effect Could Tip The Balance In The U.S. Senate +

    ATLANTA, GEORGIA—When Yoehzer Yeeftahk saw images of Michael Brown’s lifeless body laying in the streets of Ferguson, Missouri for upwards Read More
  • TPP Media March +

    Join our TPP Twitter Storm. Everyone with a Twitter account can participate. The Twitter storm begins on Tuesday at 9pm Read More
  • 'Born and raised' Texans forced to prove identities under new voter ID law +

    New law meant to combat fraud forces Eric Kennie to either change his identity or be unable to overcome burdens Read More
  • The Nation's Shame: The Injustice of Mandatory Minimums +

    For decades, lawyers, scholars, and judges have criticized mandatory drug sentencing as oppressive and ineffective. Yet tens of thousands of Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13

Does Your Legislator Support the ERA

 

ERAMap