On Thursday, a group of Democratic lawmakers proposed a law to establish a Code of Conduct for the Supreme Court. It’s surely to have Supreme Court Justices Thomas and Scalia quaking in their Tea Party boots because it would mean they would actually have to be independent of political and other influences. They would also have to have the appearance of independence. They would have to stay away from political activity. That part would be really hard.
Published in End Corporate Rule

This weekend, U.S. Supreme Court reporters pulled an all-nighter waiting for the ruling on whether Texas’ new voter photo ID law, which may prevent up to 600,000 otherwise eligible voters from casting ballots this fall, would be allowed go into effect today.

Featured News

  • Marisa Farnco: A Movement That's Committed, Experienced, and Ready +

    Below is an op-ed from the #Not1More Campaign’s lead organizer, Marisa Franco. I woke up yesterday with an organizing hangover. Read More
  • How The Immigrant Rights Movement Got Obama To Save Millions From Deportations +

    A battle raged among allies, publicly and behind the scenes, to shift focus from a legislative overhaul strategy to making Read More
  • It’s time for Illinois to ratify ERA +

    Once more, the State of Illinois has an opportunity to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It Read More
  • Dozens of Activists Arrested in Battle Against a Fracking “Gateway Drug” in New York +

    Residents of New York’s Finger Lakes argue that gas projects would spell ecological and economic disaster for the region. Read More
  • Journalists Aren’t Covering Local Elections. Our Democracy Is Suffering Because of It. +

    Elections should be about important issues like economic policy, climate change and national security (to name a few). And with Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21

Does Your Legislator Support the ERA

 

ERAMap