Newsflash:
Issues Economic and Social Justice The Robin Hood Tax SD Medicaid Expansion Feds reject Daugaard's partial Medicaid plan
Wednesday, 05 March 2014 00:00

Feds reject Daugaard's partial Medicaid plan

Written by  David Montgomery | ArgusLeader.com
Rate this item
(0 votes)

PIERRE — Republican leaders in South Dakota had hope Monday that the U.S. government would let them cover only half the people federal law calls on South Dakota to add to Medicaid.On Tuesday, that hope was quashed.

In a conference call late Tuesday afternoon involving legislative leaders from both parties and federal Medicaid chief Cindy Mann, South Dakota officials were told their request for a partial Medicaid expansion would not be allowed.

“Where we had maybe a glimmer of hope through some other channels that they would be willing to look at a compromise that would be good for South Dakota, they apparently decided at levels higher up that they would not be willing to compromise, and it would be full expansion ... take it or leave it,” said call participant Sen. Tim Rave, the Senate Republican leader.

Gov. Dennis Daugaard asked the federal government in late January for permission to expand Medicaid to cover people earning up to 100 percent of the poverty line — $11,670 for an individual or $23,850 for a family of four. About 26,000 uninsured South Dakotans earn less than that.

The Affordable Care Act calls for states to expand Medicaid up to 133 percent of poverty, which is $15,521 for an individual or $31,721 for a family of four. Another 22,000 uninsured South Dakotans earn 100 percent to 133 percent of the poverty line.

Under the Affordable Care Act, those 22,000 people are eligible for heavily subsidized private health insurance through the online health care exchange, but the poorer group of 26,000 cannot — a dilemma created when the U.S. Supreme Court threw out part of the health reform law in 2012.

It’s cheaper for the federal government to insure people through Medicaid than through subsidized insurance. But Medicaid is costlier to states, which pay a portion of the cost — almost nothing at first, then gradually up to 10 percent in 2020.

“They want us to bear the burden of that cost,” Rave said.

South Dakota Democrats, who reached out to President Obama’s administration to urge consideration of Daugaard’s partial expansion proposal, said they were disappointed but not surprised by the answer Tuesday.

“I am realistic to look at what they’ve done in other states,” said Sen. Jason Frerichs, the Senate Democratic leader. While a number of states have been given flexibility by the federal government to approach Medicaid expansion differently, none has been allowed to go only partway as Daugaard wants. Additionally, an almost identical request from Daugaard a year ago was rejected. The governor had hoped federal officials would be more receptive this time.

Despite the long odds they face in finding enough Republicans to join the cause, legislative Democrats will present an amendment next week to add Medicaid expansion into the state’s budget.

“It’s not over yet,” Frerichs said. “We’re going to take our case to the people.”

Frerichs said Medicaid expansion, which would bring hundreds of millions of dollars in federal health care spending to South Dakota, makes economic sense for the state while also helping its low-income residents.

Daugaard aide Tony Venhuizen said it’s “disappointing that they’re not willing to show flexibility to the state in this way when they had been so flexible in following the law in so many other ways as they implement it.”

The next step is unclear. States such as Iowa and Arkansas have taken hybrid approaches to expansion that some lawmakers have praised. But Daugaard’s partial expansion proposal had buy-in from South Dakota’s Republican legislators.

“I think there will be discussions about what alternatives, if any, will be pursued, but it’s too early to say,” Venhuizen said.

Rave was more blunt, predicting that nothing will happen on Medicaid expansion before the Legislature disbands March 14.

“It’s probably on hold for this legislative session,” he said.

Link to original article from Argus Leader.com

Read 1320 times

Robin Hood Tax Articles

  • Could This Tax on Wall Street Turn Back America’s Tide of Inequality?
    Could This Tax on Wall Street Turn Back America’s Tide of Inequality?

    How will you honor the legacy of Martin Luther King Jr. this April 4, the anniversary of his assassination? How about by demanding that Congress get out of Wall Street’s pocket? How about by letting your representative know that you support economic equality and a just distribution of wealth in America? As Dr. King himself said, “This is America’s opportunity to help bridge the gulf between the haves and the have-nots. The question is whether America will do it. There is nothing new about poverty. What is new is that we now have the techniques and the resources to get rid of poverty. The real question is whether we have the will.”

    Written on Monday, 31 March 2014 23:57 Read more...
  • Targeting Wall Street, Robin Hood Tax Comes to Washington
    Targeting Wall Street, Robin Hood Tax Comes to Washington

    With Congress about to begin the next cycle of budget battles – mostly focused on how much more pain to inflict on Main Street communities across America – a far different message is bubbling up across the land.

    Written on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 23:08 Read more...
  • The Robin Hood Tax
    The Robin Hood Tax

    Simply put, the big idea behind the Robin Hood Tax is to generate hundreds of billions of dollars.  That money could provide funding for jobs to kickstart the economy and get America back on its feet. It could help save the social safety net here and around the world.  And it will come from fairer taxation of the financial sector.

    Written on Friday, 25 October 2013 15:41 Read more...
  • European Commission Approves “Robin Hood” Tax on Financial Transactions
    European Commission Approves “Robin Hood” Tax on Financial Transactions The European Commission yesterday backed plans by 11 European Union economies to impose a “Robin Hood” financial transaction tax, better known as a Tobin tax, to help raise funds to tackle the region’s growing debt crisis.
    Written on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 16:53 Read more...

Does Your Legislator Support the Robin Hood Tax?

PDA Radio

Listen "Live" Wednesday, 9/17/2014 @ 8pm
RevYearwood

Rev. Lennox Yearwood
Special Guest Bill McKibben

Call In Number 347-202-0385

Sign the ERA Petition

ERADemandButton

On Friday, September 12th more than 150 activists will go to DC and Demand that their Senators and Representatives support removing the ratification deadline from the ERA (SJ Res 15 and HJ Res 113)

Button-SignERAPetition

Sign the TPP Fast Track Petitions

MoveOn.org Petition - Congress Don't Renew Fast Track

Public Citizen Petition - Congress Must Reject Fast Track Authority

MoveOn.org Petition - Stop the Trans Pacific Partnership

CREDO Petition - Stop the Massive Corporate Power Grab

 

Find Your Elected Officials for Issues

Enter your zip+4 and find your elected officials. This link provides name, address and phone number

ButtonFindElectedOfficials

 

Like Robin Hood Tax on Facebook

The Robin Hood Tax

Robin Hood Tax: John Nichols and Keith Ellison and Michael Lighty

Why The Robin Hood Tax