Issues End Corporate Rule ERA Articles The ERA and the NCGA 2013
Tuesday, 05 November 2013 00:00

The ERA and the NCGA 2013

Written by  Marena Groll

Targeting women’s right to vote may be the undoing of extreme governance and an opportunity to take care of constitutionally unfinished business for women – an Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). The newly declared war on the right of women in NC to vote looks to be the match to the fuse in the renewed push for passing an ERA.

NC legislators introduced House Bill 589, the Voter Identification and Verification Act (VIVA) requiring strict forms of photo ID constituting an assault on the19th Amendment passed in 1920 guaranteeing women the right to vote. Assaulting a class of citizen’s right to vote undermines their ability to address every other issue of inequality and discrimination and is therefore a politically lethal weapon.

From a Democracy NC report, consider this critical finding that indicates that the new law disproportionately impacts women. The Board matched its list of registered voters with the DMV list of people holding a license or state identity card. The Board found that about 506,600 active, registered voters could not reliably be matched with the DMV list.

Focusing on those voters consider that women are 54% of all active registered voters, but 66% of the active registered voters without a NC photo ID. Almost 335,150 women are at risk for being silenced because they don’t have the exclusive photo ID being required.

They are the LARGEST DEMOGRAPHIC at risk as a result of the strict forms of photo ID laws.

  • African Americans are 22% of all active registered voters, but they are 31% of the active registered voters who do not have a NC photo ID.
  • Seniors are 18% of active voters, but 26% of those without a NC photo ID.
  • Youth are 13% of active voters, but 16% of those without a NC photo ID.

No doubt some women are caught up in the process of changing names to accommodate our culture of patriarchy, only to have it used against them in a further act of patriarchy to limit their voting.

You can’t vote them out if you don’t possess the exclusive ID they require to do so.

Had women been a constitutionally suspect class by sex they would have had much stronger footing to join those challenging VIVA based on the suspect class of race.

Make no mistake, there has never been a woman born of any color who has drawn a breath being definitively guaranteed her civil rights under the U.S. Constitution in the way that men of every color have.

Roberta W. Francis, National Council of Women’s Organization ERA Task Force Co-Chair, analyzes recent court cases as to the effect the passage of an ERA could have considering “strict scrutiny” versus the lesser “skeptical scrutiny” in race and sex discrimination cases.

“For the first time, "sex" would be a suspect classification requiring the same high level of "strict scrutiny" and having to meet the same high level of justification — a "necessary" relation to a "compelling" state interest — that the classification of race currently requires.”

“Ironically, under current court decisions about sex and race discrimination, a white male claiming race discrimination by a program or action is protected by strict scrutiny, but a black female claiming sex discrimination by the same program or action is protected by only skeptical, not strict, scrutiny:” “Unless we put into the Constitution the bedrock principle that equality of rights cannot be denied or abridged on account of sex, the political and judicial victories women have achieved with their blood, sweat, and tears for the past two centuries are vulnerable to erosion or reversal at any time — now or in the future.”

Erosion abounds in the increased opposition we saw to Title IX (equal opportunity in education), the Violence against Women Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act. The Health Care rights debacle drew thousands of protesting women to our legislature mirroring the actions of fed-up women in other states. Unbelievably there are legislators voting to pay for Viagra for servicemen but opposing funding for family planning and contraception and denying resources for abortion services even in cases of rape and incest.

In the recent government shutdown, slashing of education funds, cuts to domestic violence programs and ripping up of social safety net programs coupled with a refusal to expand Medicaid have hurt women the worst. The NC Council of Women reports that nearly 17 percent of North Carolina women live in poverty or near-poverty. Almost 200,000 of them, operating with no health insurance, may lose out further because our legislators refused to expand Medicaid although it was largely paid for under the Affordable Care Act.

But even in the midst of assaults, four joint resolutions bills were introduced into the US Senate and House in 2013 supporting more than one path to pass an ERA and pushing back against the assaults on women’s rights - Senate Joint Resolution 10 and House Joint Resolution 56 for the traditional Article V ratification process of the ERA and Senate Joint Resolution 15 and House Joint Resolution 43 for the “three-state strategy” process that would remove the time limit for ratification.

As tellingly, attending recent women’s conferences in NC, discussions of a state constitutional ERA have erupted in concert with discussions of the number of women voters potentially silenced by the actions of the NCGA.

Ironic. Depriving women of their vote may well result in a constitutional ERA that ensures no one ever gets another chance to do that.

Let’s take care of that unfinished business.

Read 1819 times Last modified on Thursday, 07 November 2013 16:43

End Corporate Rule

  • Bernie Sanders Raises Battle Cry Against Citizens United: "I Vote for Democracy!"
    Bernie Sanders Raises Battle Cry Against Citizens United: "I Vote for Democracy!"

    Citizens United is not just the default reference for US Supreme Court decisions—including the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling—that have ushered in a new era of corporate dominance of American elections. It’s the name of the conservative group that encouraged Chief Justice John Roberts and the most activist Court majority in American history to tear the heart out of what were already weak campaign finance laws.

    Written on Sunday, 13 April 2014 04:24
  • Local protests held in response to Supreme Court donation ruling
    Local protests held in response to Supreme Court donation ruling

    PITTSFIELD -- Their signs read "Get Big Money Out of Politics," "Democracy Is Not For Sale" and "This Is What Plutocracy Looks Like." About a dozen of them stood in Park Square on Wednesday evening, one of 130 "rapid response events" coordinated nationwide to protest that morning's Supreme Court decision in McCutcheon v. FEC.    

    Written on Friday, 04 April 2014 14:38
  • With McCutcheon Ruling, An Activist Court Opts for Full-On Plutocracy
    With McCutcheon Ruling, An Activist Court Opts for Full-On Plutocracy

    Any doubts about the determination of an activist United States Supreme Court to rewrite election rules so that the dollar matters more than the vote were removed Wednesday, when McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission was decided in favor of the dollar.

    Written on Wednesday, 02 April 2014 22:24
  • TPM Interview: The Brown Grad Student Who Chased The NRA Out Of Rhode Island
    TPM Interview: The Brown Grad Student Who Chased The NRA Out Of Rhode Island

    Sam Bell is in the third year of a PhD program in geology at Brown University. Geology as in rocks. But Bell also moonlights as the the state coordinator of The Rhode Island Progressive Democrats, the state affiliate of the 10-year-old Progressive Democrats of America. And in his work with The Rhode Island Progressive Democrats, Bell was instrumental to the investigation that ultimately led to the National Rifle Association paying the second largest campaign finance fine in the state's history.

    Written on Thursday, 27 February 2014 22:13
  • Thank a Postal Worker This Holiday Season
    Thank a Postal Worker This Holiday Season

    Postal workers are giving it their all this holiday season, as cards and packages and returns must be collected and delivered amidst ice storms, snowstorms and wild temperature drops.

    They deserve our thanks in 2013.

    And our support in 2014.

    Written on Thursday, 26 December 2013 23:49
  • Fast Food Giants Gorge on Subsidies
    Fast Food Giants Gorge on Subsidies

    Thanks to a loophole that subsidizes CEO pay, McDonald's, Yum Brands, Wendy's, Burger King, Domino's, and Dunkin' Brands trimmed $64 million from their tax bills in 2011 and 2012.

    The fast food industry is notorious for handing out lean paychecks to their burger flippers and fat ones to their CEOs. What’s less well-known is that taxpayers are actually subsidizing fast food incomes at both the bottom — and top — of the industry.

    Written on Monday, 02 December 2013 23:07
  • This Thanksgiving, Let's Celebrate AgriCULTURE, Not AgriBUSINESS
    This Thanksgiving, Let's Celebrate AgriCULTURE, Not AgriBUSINESS

    In December 1972, I was part of a nationwide campaign that came tantalizingly close to getting the U.S. Senate to reject Earl Butz, Richard Nixon's choice for secretary of agriculture. A coalition of grass-roots farmers, consumers and scrappy public interest organizations (like the Agribusiness Accountability Project that Susan DeMarco and I then headed) teamed up with some gutsy, unabashedly progressive senators to undertake the almost impossible challenge of defeating the cabinet nominee of a president who'd just been elected in a landslide.

    Written on Friday, 29 November 2013 00:06
  • Arizona Democratic Party Shows Its Progressive Side at State Committee Meeting
    Arizona Democratic Party Shows Its Progressive Side at State Committee Meeting

    Progressive voices were heard loud and clear at Saturday’s Arizona Democratic Party (ADP) State Committee Meeting in Maricopa, Arizona.

    Unlike some past ADP meetings where progressives were ignored or where progressive resolutions were tabled and not heard by the full ADP membership, the Maricopa meeting was dominated by progressives.

    Written on Monday, 18 November 2013 20:09
  • Can Public Banking Spur Economic Growth in Southern Arizona?
    Can Public Banking Spur Economic Growth in Southern Arizona?

    Tucson is one of the most impoverished cities in the country—for many reasons. The Arizona Legislature—driven by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and short-sighted, “small government” ideology—has routinely swept funds earmarked for counties and cities to “balance” the state’s budget or fund pet projects like lower corporate taxes. Beyond the Legislature’s negative impact on Baja Arizona, the Tucson economy is not diversified enough. Manufacturing is nearly non-existent in Southern Arizona. There is an over-reliance on defense spending, University of Arizona spin-offs, tourism, low-wage service jobs, and growth/development. 

    Written on Friday, 15 November 2013 15:56

Find Your Elected Officials for Issues

Enter your zip+4 and find your elected officials. This link provides name, address and phone number



Progressive Central Panel on Ending Corporate Rule

Ask Bill Moyers How to Overturn Citizens United