Newsflash:
Issues End Corporate Rule Trans Pacific Partnership Biden Remark Casts Doubt on Pillar of U.S. Trade Agenda
Friday, 14 February 2014 21:34

Biden Remark Casts Doubt on Pillar of U.S. Trade Agenda

Written by  Mark Landler and Jonathan Weisman | NY Times

WASHINGTON — Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. on Friday acknowledged that Congress will not grant President Obama fast-track trade promotion authority, which analysts say is critical to the president’s hopes to forge huge trade deals with Asia and Europe.

Mr. Biden’s comments called into question the central pillars of the White House’s trade agenda, most immediately the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a regional trade pact involving 12 nations, which is the most visible element of Mr. Obama’s strategic shift toward Asia.

Responding to a question at a policy retreat for House Democratic leaders in Cambridge, Md., Mr. Biden said he knew it was not coming up now, according to people who were in the meeting.

And the vice president took a hard line on the United States’ main trading partners in the Pacific, telling Democrats that he informed the Japanese that the trans-Pacific partnership — a huge trade accord for the entire Pacific Rim — could not go forward if the United States’ auto industry continued to have only a 1 percent market penetration in Japan.

Mr. Biden did, however, stress the importance of engaging Asia and the Pacific to the United States’ economy and security. One House member answered, “Thanks for your explanation of geopolitical priorities,” according to another member who was in the room.

Mr. Biden replied, “But I also get local political priorities.”

Most Democrats in both chambers of Congress oppose granting Mr. Obama fast-track authority, which is considered vital to obtaining trade concessions from foreign countries because it would bar amendments to those deals when they go before Congress for ratification.

Last month, the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, said he had no plans to schedule a vote on trade promotion authority. On Wednesday, the House Democratic leader, Nancy Pelosi of California, told reporters that giving Mr. Obama that authority was “out of the question.”

Democrats, as well as labor and environmental groups, worry that multilateral trade deals inevitably siphon off manufacturing jobs in the United States, and say that these pacts do not do enough to protect the environment.

Mr. Obama, who spoke after Mr. Biden, did not mention the trade promotion issue in his brief remarks, focusing on issues on which the Democrats are generally united, like raising the federal minimum wage and overhauling the nation’s immigration laws.

“When it comes to immigration,” Mr. Obama said, referring to resistance from Republicans, “punting and putting things off for another year, another two years, another three years, it hurts people. It hurts our economy. It hurts families.”

The remarks by the president and the vice president come as both parties paper over divisions approaching the midterm election season. Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio heeded warnings from his Republican members and put an immigration overhaul on pause to avoid the spectacle of intraparty warfare on the issue.

This week, Mr. Boehner engineered quick passage of legislation to lift the government’s borrowing authority past the November election, “pulling the bandage off the scab and doing it fast,” said Representative Charlie Dent, Republican of Pennsylvania.

Fast-track trade authority is the issue on which the White House and congressional Democratic leaders are most obviously at loggerheads. In the past two weeks, Mr. Boehner has taken to publicly goading Mr. Obama to move forward on it, saying it was one area in which Republicans and the White House could work together to create jobs.

A spokesman for Mr. Boehner, Brendan Buck, said in a statement after Mr. Obama’s speech, “The president can ignore the trade issue all he wants, but that won’t change the fact that it’s his own party standing in the way of one of his priorities.”

Correction: February 14, 2014 

Because of an editing error, an earlier version of this article misstated the source of comments from Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. They were not from a transcript of his remarks provided by the vice president’s office; they were from lawmakers who were at the meeting.

Original article on NY Times

Read 2485 times

End Corporate Rule

  • Bernie Sanders Raises Battle Cry Against Citizens United: "I Vote for Democracy!"
    Bernie Sanders Raises Battle Cry Against Citizens United: "I Vote for Democracy!"

    Citizens United is not just the default reference for US Supreme Court decisions—including the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling—that have ushered in a new era of corporate dominance of American elections. It’s the name of the conservative group that encouraged Chief Justice John Roberts and the most activist Court majority in American history to tear the heart out of what were already weak campaign finance laws.

    Written on Sunday, 13 April 2014 04:24 Read more...
  • Local protests held in response to Supreme Court donation ruling
    Local protests held in response to Supreme Court donation ruling

    PITTSFIELD -- Their signs read "Get Big Money Out of Politics," "Democracy Is Not For Sale" and "This Is What Plutocracy Looks Like." About a dozen of them stood in Park Square on Wednesday evening, one of 130 "rapid response events" coordinated nationwide to protest that morning's Supreme Court decision in McCutcheon v. FEC.    

    Written on Friday, 04 April 2014 14:38 Read more...
  • With McCutcheon Ruling, An Activist Court Opts for Full-On Plutocracy
    With McCutcheon Ruling, An Activist Court Opts for Full-On Plutocracy

    Any doubts about the determination of an activist United States Supreme Court to rewrite election rules so that the dollar matters more than the vote were removed Wednesday, when McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission was decided in favor of the dollar.

    Written on Wednesday, 02 April 2014 22:24 Read more...
  • TPM Interview: The Brown Grad Student Who Chased The NRA Out Of Rhode Island
    TPM Interview: The Brown Grad Student Who Chased The NRA Out Of Rhode Island

    Sam Bell is in the third year of a PhD program in geology at Brown University. Geology as in rocks. But Bell also moonlights as the the state coordinator of The Rhode Island Progressive Democrats, the state affiliate of the 10-year-old Progressive Democrats of America. And in his work with The Rhode Island Progressive Democrats, Bell was instrumental to the investigation that ultimately led to the National Rifle Association paying the second largest campaign finance fine in the state's history.

    Written on Thursday, 27 February 2014 22:13 Read more...
  • Thank a Postal Worker This Holiday Season
    Thank a Postal Worker This Holiday Season

    Postal workers are giving it their all this holiday season, as cards and packages and returns must be collected and delivered amidst ice storms, snowstorms and wild temperature drops.

    They deserve our thanks in 2013.

    And our support in 2014.

    Written on Thursday, 26 December 2013 23:49 Read more...
  • Fast Food Giants Gorge on Subsidies
    Fast Food Giants Gorge on Subsidies

    Thanks to a loophole that subsidizes CEO pay, McDonald's, Yum Brands, Wendy's, Burger King, Domino's, and Dunkin' Brands trimmed $64 million from their tax bills in 2011 and 2012.

    The fast food industry is notorious for handing out lean paychecks to their burger flippers and fat ones to their CEOs. What’s less well-known is that taxpayers are actually subsidizing fast food incomes at both the bottom — and top — of the industry.

    Written on Monday, 02 December 2013 23:07 Read more...
  • This Thanksgiving, Let's Celebrate AgriCULTURE, Not AgriBUSINESS
    This Thanksgiving, Let's Celebrate AgriCULTURE, Not AgriBUSINESS

    In December 1972, I was part of a nationwide campaign that came tantalizingly close to getting the U.S. Senate to reject Earl Butz, Richard Nixon's choice for secretary of agriculture. A coalition of grass-roots farmers, consumers and scrappy public interest organizations (like the Agribusiness Accountability Project that Susan DeMarco and I then headed) teamed up with some gutsy, unabashedly progressive senators to undertake the almost impossible challenge of defeating the cabinet nominee of a president who'd just been elected in a landslide.

    Written on Friday, 29 November 2013 00:06 Read more...
  • Arizona Democratic Party Shows Its Progressive Side at State Committee Meeting
    Arizona Democratic Party Shows Its Progressive Side at State Committee Meeting

    Progressive voices were heard loud and clear at Saturday’s Arizona Democratic Party (ADP) State Committee Meeting in Maricopa, Arizona.

    Unlike some past ADP meetings where progressives were ignored or where progressive resolutions were tabled and not heard by the full ADP membership, the Maricopa meeting was dominated by progressives.

    Written on Monday, 18 November 2013 20:09 Read more...
  • Can Public Banking Spur Economic Growth in Southern Arizona?
    Can Public Banking Spur Economic Growth in Southern Arizona?

    Tucson is one of the most impoverished cities in the country—for many reasons. The Arizona Legislature—driven by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and short-sighted, “small government” ideology—has routinely swept funds earmarked for counties and cities to “balance” the state’s budget or fund pet projects like lower corporate taxes. Beyond the Legislature’s negative impact on Baja Arizona, the Tucson economy is not diversified enough. Manufacturing is nearly non-existent in Southern Arizona. There is an over-reliance on defense spending, University of Arizona spin-offs, tourism, low-wage service jobs, and growth/development. 

    Written on Friday, 15 November 2013 15:56 Read more...

Find Your Elected Officials for Issues

Enter your zip+4 and find your elected officials. This link provides name, address and phone number

ButtonFindElectedOfficials

 

Progressive Central Panel on Ending Corporate Rule

Ask Bill Moyers How to Overturn Citizens United